Summary
holding that because "the subsequent suit names [the purported transferees] as defendants who [were] not found liable in the first suit . . . the district court's jurisdiction over the first suit does not carry over to a new, independent suit, even when the new suit is brought to enforce a prior federal judgment"
Summary of this case from Michael S. Fox Tr. of Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc. v. Koplik (In re Perry H. Koplik & Sons, Inc.)Opinion
No. 98-1892.
December 9, 1998.
Appeal from the N.D.Ill.
Affirmed.