From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gallegos v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jul 3, 2000
2 P.3d 716 (Colo. 2000)

Opinion

No. 98SC284

May 30, 2000 Rehearing Denied July 3, 2000.

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.

David Kaplan, Colorado State Public Defender Kathleen A. Lord, Chief Appellate Deputy, State Public Defender, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner.

A. William Ritter, Jr., District Attorney, Second Judicial District, Nathan B. Coats, Chief Deputy District Attorney, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.

EN BANC


Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Kourlis and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 975 P.2d 1135 (Colo.App. 1998), should be affirmed, whereas Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).

JUSTICE COATS does not participate.


Summaries of

Gallegos v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado
Jul 3, 2000
2 P.3d 716 (Colo. 2000)
Case details for

Gallegos v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark F. Gallegos, Petitioner, v. The People of The State of Colorado…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado

Date published: Jul 3, 2000

Citations

2 P.3d 716 (Colo. 2000)

Citing Cases

People v. Huerta

Defendant's claim lies in an action against DOC or the State Board of Parole, neither of which is a party…

People v. Barber

Contrary to defendant's argument, "[t]he parole board and DOC are separate entities in the Executive Branch."…