From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Galakis v. Galakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) deleting the tenth decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefore a decretal paragraph directing that the defendant maintain (a) a life insurance policy in the amount of $100,000, with the plaintiff as the beneficiary, to be maintained until the plaintiff remarries or dies, and (b) a separate and distinct life insurance policy in the sum of $100,000 listing the plaintiff as the beneficiary in trust for the parties' son until the son reaches the age of 21, and (2) adding thereto a decretal paragraph awarding the plaintiff counsel fees in the sum of $4,500 payable by the defendant; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Upon consideration of the relevant factors ( see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]), we discern no impropriety in the trial court's award of maintenance to the plaintiff either in amount or duration. Moreover, the court correctly directed the defendant to maintain life insurance policies for the benefit of the plaintiff and for the parties' son, although it appears that the court intended that the policies should be in the sum of $100,000 each, rather than the sum of $1,000,000 each, which latter sum we would have found to be unreasonable. In addition, the policy to be maintained for the benefit of the plaintiff should have been made to terminate upon her remarriage or death ( see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [c]; Walker v. Walker, 255 A.D.2d 375), and the judgment is therefore modified to so provide.

Furthermore, in light of the substantial disparity in the parties' financial circumstances, and the defendant's unexplained and apparently willful failure to comply with the pendente lite order, we find that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in failing to award counsel fees to the plaintiff. Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case and in consideration of the other payments required of the defendant, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff as counsel fees the sum of $4,500 ( see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Galakis v. Galakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Galakis v. Galakis

Case Details

Full title:PAULA M. GALAKIS, Respondent-Appellant, v. NICHOLAOS S. GALAKIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 431 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 718

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Giliya v. Warren

Since the father did not controvert the key facts alleged in the application concerning the parties'…

Frankel v. Frankel

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Upon…