From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GAIN v. DUNN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.


Motion to dismiss complaint on promissory note, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiff alleges a written statement by defendant as follows: "I have my good health — and if I can get going again the bankruptcy will mean nothing to me — every dollar I owe will be paid." This does not amount to a new promise. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GAIN v. DUNN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

GAIN v. DUNN

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE E. GAIN, as Executrix, etc., of MARY BELLE HILKE, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Linzer v. Weitzen

In our opinion the alleged promise in writing fails to meet the tests required to establish a present…

Linzer v. Weitzen

A debt discharged in bankruptcy is revived and thereafter becomes actionable only when by an unequivocal…