From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gage v. Golden Corral Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2014
583 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1457

09-02-2014

ALFRED G. GAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Alfred G. Gage, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Image materials not available for display.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00132-F) Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfred G. Gage, Appellant Pro Se. David L. Woodard, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alfred G. Gage appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant and dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gage v. Golden Corral Corp., No. 5:13-cv-00132-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Gage v. Golden Corral Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 2, 2014
583 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Gage v. Golden Corral Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED G. GAGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 2, 2014

Citations

583 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2014)