From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gadson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 24, 2001
776 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 3D01-36.

Opinion filed January 24, 2001.

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Richard Margolius, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 90-6477.

Benjamin Gadson, in proper person. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the denial of defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. It is well established that successive motions which were raised on appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings are procedurally barred. See Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding that defendant abuses the judicial process by filing successive motions "that attempt to litigate issues that were, could, or should have been raised either on direct appeal or in his previous motions"; and warning defendant that "a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal in any court is subject to having his or her gain time forfeited.").Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gadson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 24, 2001
776 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Gadson v. State

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN GADSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 24, 2001

Citations

776 So. 2d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)