Opinion
2002-01039
Argued January 21, 2003.
February 18, 2003.
In an action, inter alia, to set aside the sale of a business and real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated January 11, 2002, which denied their motion to set aside a stipulation of discontinuance and granted the cross motion of the defendant Helen A. Silva to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
Bart and Schwartz, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Dawn A. Lott of counsel), for appellants.
Mark G. Deifik, Westbury, N.Y., for respondent Helen A. Silva.
Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Stipulations are favored by the courts and will be set aside only upon a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, overreaching, duress, or mistake (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230; Zwirn v. Zwirn, 153 A.D.2d 854). The plaintiffs failed to make the requisite showing. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion to set aside the stipulation of discontinuance and properly granted the cross motion of the defendant Helen A. Silva to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
SANTUCCI, J.P., LUCIANO, SCHMIDT and ADAMS, JJ., concur.