Fuzzysharp Techs., Inc. v. Intel Corp.

Full title: FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Case No.: 12-CV-4413 YGR (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 12-CV-4413 YGR

03-04-2013

FUZZYSHARP TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendants.

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT

ORDER

Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

A Case Management Conference was held on February 25, 2013, and the Court hereby ENTERS the Case Management Order as follows:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Party ¦Item ¦Due Date ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Complete Rule 26(f) Meet and Confer ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦All ¦(re: Initial Disclosures, Discovery, ¦February 4, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ADR ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Process, Early Settlement) ¦ ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦ ¦File 26(f) Report; File Joint Case ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦All ¦Management Statement and Proposed ¦February 18, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Order ¦ ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦All ¦Case Management Conference ¦February 25, 2013 ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Disclosure of Asserted Claims and ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Infringement Contentions ¦ ¦ ¦FuzzySharp¦ ¦March 11, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦(With Accompanying Doc Production) ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 ¦ ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Invalidity Contentions (With ¦April 25, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Intel ¦Accompanying Doc Production) ¦(45 days after ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Infringement ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Contentions) ¦ +----------+---------------------------------------+--------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Exchange of Proposed Terms for ¦May 9, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦All ¦Construction ¦(14 days after Invalidity ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 4-1 ¦Contentions) ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Party ¦Item ¦Due Date ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦May 30, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦Exchange of Preliminary Claim ¦ ¦ ¦All ¦ ¦(21 days after Exchange of ¦ ¦ ¦Constructions and Extrinsic ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Evidence Patent L.R. 4-2 ¦Proposed Terms for ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Construction) ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Joint Claim Construction and Pre- ¦ ¦ ¦All ¦ ¦June 24, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦Hearing Statement Due Patent L.R. ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦4-3 ¦ ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦Claim Construction Discovery ¦July 25, 2013 ¦ ¦All ¦Deadline Patent L.R. 4-4 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦(31 days after JCC) ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦FuzzySharp¦Claim Construction Opening Brief ¦August 9, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 4-5(a) ¦ ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦August 23, 2013 ¦ ¦Intel ¦Claim Construction Opposition Brief¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 4-5(b) ¦(14 days after service of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Opening Brief) ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦September 2, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦FuzzySharp¦Claim Construction Reply Brief ¦(8 days after service of ¦ ¦ ¦Patent L.R. 4-5(c) ¦responsive ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦brief) ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦All ¦Tutorial ¦October 2, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦All ¦Exchange exhibits for Claim ¦October 8, 2013 ¦ ¦ ¦Construction Hearing ¦ ¦ +----------+-----------------------------------+------------------------------¦ ¦All ¦Claim Construction Hearing Patent ¦October 9, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. ¦ ¦ ¦L.R. 4-6 ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the parties supplement the process of identifying the claims terms to be construed. For each claim, each party shall identify with specificity the intended impact of the proposed constructions on the merits of the case and exchange the same. The Joint Claim Construction Statement shall include each party's impact statement for each claim to be construed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE