From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Futuristic Realty Corp. v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 16, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and that branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was for disqualification of the appellants' counsel is denied.

The plaintiff's conclusory allegations fail to show that the appellants' counsel ought to be called as a witness at the trial of this action; therefore, the plaintiff's motion to disqualify him should have been denied (see, Lefkowitz v. Mr. Man, 111 A.D.2d 119, 121). Rubin, J.P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Futuristic Realty Corp. v. Mauro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 16, 1987
128 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Futuristic Realty Corp. v. Mauro

Case Details

Full title:FUTURISTIC REALTY CORP., Respondent, v. NICHOLAS MAURO et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Kaufman v. Hoff

, 258; Bernstein v. Oppenheim Co., 160 A.D.2d 428, 430). Nor is plaintiff Kaufman barred from recovering…

Kaplan v. Maytex Mills, Inc.

The plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the initial disqualification of the defendant's counsel was…