From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Futia v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-09-25

Anthony FUTIA, Jr., et al., appellants, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al., respondents.


In a hybrid action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that John Stipo is the elected “Town Committeeman, Republican Party, District # 5, Town of North Castle, Westchester County, State of New York,” and proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16, the plaintiffs/petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated October 26, 2012, which, among other things, denied the declaratory relief requested with respect to John Stipo.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment, inter alia, declaring that John Stipo is not the elected Town Committeeman, Republican Party, District # 5, Town of North Castle, Westchester County, State of New York.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs/petitioners' request for a judgment declaring that John Stipo is the elected “Town Committeeman, Republican Party, District # 5, Town of North Castle, Westchester County, State of New York.” Under the circumstances of this case, Stipo's designating petition was a nullity ( see Matter of Fischer v. NYS Bd. of Elections, 98 A.D.3d 1067, 1068, 950 N.Y.S.2d 708). Although the plaintiffs/petitioners contend that the defendants/respondents violated their rights to, inter alia, due process and equal protection, those contentions were presented to the Supreme Court in a wholly conclusory manner ( see Huntington Yacht Club v. Incorporated Vil. of Huntington Bay, 1 A.D.3d 480, 482, 767 N.Y.S.2d 132), and are without merit ( see Matter of Walton v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 13 N.Y.3d 475, 494, 893 N.Y.S.2d 453, 921 N.E.2d 145). Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiffs/petitioners are challenging the constitutionality of Election Law § 2–106(3), nothing in the record indicates that they provided the requisite notice to the Attorney General ( see Executive Law § 71[3]; McGee v. Korman, 70 N.Y.2d 225, 231–232, 519 N.Y.S.2d 350, 513 N.E.2d 236).

Since this is, in part, a declaratory judgment action, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment, inter alia, declaring that John Stipo is not the elected Town Committeeman, Republican Party, District # 5, Town of North Castle, Westchester County, State of New York ( see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, 229 N.Y.S.2d 380, 183 N.E.2d 670,appeal dismissed371 U.S. 74, 83 S.Ct. 177, 9 L.Ed.2d 163,cert. denied371 U.S. 901, 83 S.Ct. 205, 9 L.Ed.2d 164).

MASTRO, J.P., HALL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Futia v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2013
109 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Futia v. Westchester Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Case Details

Full title:Anthony FUTIA, Jr., et al., appellants, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
971 N.Y.S.2d 704
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5984

Citing Cases

Fuchs v. Itzkowitz

To the extent that the appellants are challenging the constitutionality of Election Law § 6–132(3), they were…