From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fuisz Pharma LLC v. Theranos, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Jun 7, 2012
Civ. No. 11-1061-SLR/CJB (D. Del. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 11-1061-SLR/CJB

06-07-2012

FUISZ PHARMA LLC, Plaintiff, v. THERANOS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

At Wilmington this 7th day of June, 2012, having considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke issued on May 18, 2012, and upon the expiration of the time allowed for objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with no objection having been filed;

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Burke's Report and Recommendation (D.I. 31) is accepted.

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss, stay or transfer (D.I. 14) is granted in part.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

_______________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fuisz Pharma LLC v. Theranos, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Jun 7, 2012
Civ. No. 11-1061-SLR/CJB (D. Del. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Fuisz Pharma LLC v. Theranos, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FUISZ PHARMA LLC, Plaintiff, v. THERANOS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 11-1061-SLR/CJB (D. Del. Jun. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

TruePosition, Inc. v. Polaris Wireless, Inc.

Although this argument may be relevant to other Jumara factors and will be analyzed accordingly, "in light of…

Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc. v. Grecia

Although the issues in the second-filed suit had not been "squarely before the [first-filed] court," Judge…