From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fudge v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Sep 27, 2007
2:07CV00101 WRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2007)

Opinion

2:07CV00101 WRW.

September 27, 2007


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's complaint (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failing to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8.

2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry #1) is DENIED AS MOOT.

3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), than an in forma pauperis appeal from the order and judgment dismissing this case is considered frivolous and not in good faith.


Summaries of

Fudge v. Hobbs

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Sep 27, 2007
2:07CV00101 WRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Fudge v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CHARLES FUDGE ADC #78875 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Sep 27, 2007

Citations

2:07CV00101 WRW (E.D. Ark. Sep. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Ward v. Kelley

George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007). The Eastern District of Arkansas has taken a similar…