From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FTL Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1980
78 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

October 30, 1980


Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 27, 1980, which denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-respondent on the ground of res judicata and collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The inadequacy of the record, particularly the lack of reasons for the reduction of plaintiff-respondent's claim against the shipper Interstate from $34,355.43 to $4,707.93 by the Bankruptcy Court, precludes us from determining on the merits whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel should be applied, as now contended by defendant-appellant. For the same reason — inadequacy of the record — we are unable to determine whether, as claimed by defendant-appellant, plaintiff-respondent has been paid in full so as to bar the present action.

Concur — Birns, J.P., Fein, Sullivan, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.


Summaries of

FTL Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1980
78 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

FTL Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Case Details

Full title:FTL COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Ridge v. Gold

N.Y.3d at 39, 769 N.Y.S.2d 184, 801 N.E.2d 404). The record before us, which does not contain any excerpts…