From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friends of Jennings Lodge v. Clackamas Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jun 28, 2017
396 P.3d 967 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

A163507

06-28-2017

FRIENDS OF JENNINGS LODGE, Petitioner, and Kris Balle and Carol Mastronarde, Petitioners Below, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY and Lennar Northwest, Inc., Respondents.

William K. Kabeiseman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bateman Seidel, P.C. Kelly S. Hossaini, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Lennar Northwest, Inc. With her on the brief was Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP. No appearance for respondent Clackamas County.


William K. Kabeiseman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bateman Seidel, P.C.Kelly S. Hossaini, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Lennar Northwest, Inc. With her on the brief was Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP.

No appearance for respondent Clackamas County.

Before Sercombe, Presiding Judge, and Hadlock, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge.

Hadlock, C.J., vice Flynn, J. pro tempore.
--------

PER CURIAMAffirmed. Reinert v. Clackamas County , 286 Or.App. 431, 398 P.3d 989 (2017).


Summaries of

Friends of Jennings Lodge v. Clackamas Cnty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jun 28, 2017
396 P.3d 967 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Friends of Jennings Lodge v. Clackamas Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:FRIENDS OF JENNINGS LODGE, Petitioner, and Kris Balle and Carol…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

396 P.3d 967 (Or. Ct. App. 2017)
286 Or. App. 526

Citing Cases

Reinert v. Clackamas Cnty.

On review, we conclude that LUBA's interpretation of the intended meaning of the ordinances and its…