From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friend Development Group v. Rood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-03973.

March 31, 2009.

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), dated April 22, 2008, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Vergilis Stenger Roberts Davis, LLP, Wappingers Falls, N.Y. (Kenneth M. Stenger of counsel), for appellant.

McCabe Mack, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Richard R. DuValle of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Dillon, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324) by establishing that a letter from the plaintiffs attorney dated January 14, 2008, constituted a cancellation of the contract for the sale of the subject property ( see Gold v First Stop Tire Shop, Inc., 50 AD3d 738; Jericho Group, Ltd. v Midtown Dev., L.P., 32 AD3d 294, 298; Degree Sec. Sys., Inc. v F.A.B. Land Corp., 17 AD3d 402, 403). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.


Summaries of

Friend Development Group v. Rood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2009
60 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Friend Development Group v. Rood

Case Details

Full title:FRIEND DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF LOUISE Y. ROOD et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2559
875 N.Y.S.2d 815

Citing Cases

Lot 57 Acquisition Corp. v. Yat Yar Equities Corp.

Since the defendant Yat Yar Equities Corp. (hereinafter Yat Yar) did not raise the defense of lack of…