From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 17, 1937
250 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Summary

In Friedman v. State of New York (250 App. Div. 809) it was held that section 288 did not permit the examination before trial of employees or agents of the State in a claim pending in the Court of Claims. Shortly thereafter, the Legislature empowered the court to order such examination.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Port Petroleum v. Atl. Term

Opinion

March 17, 1937.

Appeal from Court of Claims.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The application is made under sections 288 and 289 of the Civil Practice Act. The application was properly denied. ( Bush Terminal Co. v. City of New York, 259 N.Y. 509.) Order unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

Friedman v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 17, 1937
250 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

In Friedman v. State of New York (250 App. Div. 809) it was held that section 288 did not permit the examination before trial of employees or agents of the State in a claim pending in the Court of Claims. Shortly thereafter, the Legislature empowered the court to order such examination.

Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Port Petroleum v. Atl. Term
Case details for

Friedman v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL FRIEDMAN, as Administrator, etc., of MORRIS FRIEDMAN, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Port Petroleum v. Atl. Term

In 1941 section 292-a of the Civil Practice Act was added (L. 1941, ch. 921) which authorizes the court to…