From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1910
142 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

December, 1910.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that at the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and not of defendant. ( Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67; affd., 171 N.Y. 677; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94; affd., 171 N.Y. 507; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214, 135 id. 839; McCarthy v. McCabe, 131 id. 396; Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co., 134 id. 453, 456.) Hirschberg, P.J., Woodward, Burr, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1910
142 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Company

Case Details

Full title:Jacob J. Friedman, Respondent, v. James F. Scholes Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1910

Citations

142 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
126 N.Y.S. 1129

Citing Cases

Callahan v. Munson Steamship Line

the boat at the disposal of the charterers if the owners intended to assume and to retain the burden and…