From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Friedland v. Dept. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 862.

April 24, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered December 13, 2005, which dismissed this CPLR article 78 proceeding as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Wolf Wolf, LLP, Bronx (Edward H. Wolf of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.


This probationary principal failed to commence this proceeding within four months from the termination date of her employment ( see Matter of Lipton v New York City Bd. of Educ., 284 AD2d 140 [2001]). Petitioner's claims of procedural irregularities in the administrative review process are not borne out by the record. We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Friedland v. Dept. of Educ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Friedland v. Dept. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA FRIEDLAND, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2007

Citations

39 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3571
832 N.Y.S.2d 800

Citing Cases

Richards v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

This court may not review respondents' termination of petitioner's probationary employment because more than…

Richards v. Bd. of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of New York

This court may not review respondents' termination of petitioner's probationary employment because more than…