Fricker v. New York City off Track Betting

Full title: WILLIAM FRICKER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY OFF TRACK BETTING…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1995

213 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

624 N.Y.S.2d 928

Opinion

March 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the record reveals that the court's charge, as a whole, sufficiently instructed the jury about the law of proximate cause and the factual issues to be resolved (see, Scandell v. Salerno, 155 A.D.2d 523; Bartlett v General Elec. Co., 90 A.D.2d 183).

We have examined the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.