From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frial-Carrasco v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 19, 2018
138 S. Ct. 1314 (2018)

Summary

affirming pill mill convictions for jointly tried security guard, physician, and physician assistant

Summary of this case from United States v. Mithavayani

Opinion

No. 17–7808.

03-19-2018

Lucille FRIAL–CARRASCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Frial-Carrasco v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Mar 19, 2018
138 S. Ct. 1314 (2018)

affirming pill mill convictions for jointly tried security guard, physician, and physician assistant

Summary of this case from United States v. Mithavayani
Case details for

Frial-Carrasco v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Lucille FRIAL–CARRASCO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

138 S. Ct. 1314 (2018)
200 L. Ed. 2d 494

Citing Cases

United States v. Mithavayani

See, e.g., United States v. Elliott, 876 F.3d 855, 858, 866 (6th Cir. 2017) (rejecting challenge that expert…

United States v. Mithavayani

In any event, Sixth Circuit precedent contradicts Mithavayani's categorical and citation-free assertion. See,…