From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freundlich v. South Seas Operating

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 5, 1981
398 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-1681.

May 19, 1981. Rehearing Denied June 5, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Joseph J.

Joseph J. Glazer and David W. Singer, Hallandale, for appellant.

Leland E. Stansell, Jr., and Douglas A. McDuff, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.


An adjoining property owner has no duty to maintain a public sidewalk. Cantens v. Jeff-Son, Inc., 381 So.2d 307 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), Beattie v. City of Coral Gables, 358 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Upon examination of the record and briefs there appears no genuine issue of material fact and defendant-appellee is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Freundlich v. South Seas Operating

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 5, 1981
398 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Freundlich v. South Seas Operating

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY FREUNDLICH, APPELLANT, v. SOUTH SEAS OPERATING CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 5, 1981

Citations

398 So. 2d 490 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Young v. Surfside Bootery, Inc.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Freundlich v. South Seas Operating Corp., 398 So.2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Cantens v.…

Schupbach v. City of Sarasota

As a general rule, an abutting property owner has no duty to maintain a public sidewalk. See Freundlich v.…