From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freligh v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 14, 2017
91 N.E.3d 697 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 147 SSM 32

12-14-2017

James E. FRELIGH II, Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Basch & Keegan, LLP, Kingston (Derek J. Spada of counsel), for appellant. Thuillez, Ford, Gold, Butler & Monroe, LLP, Albany (Daisy F. Paglia of counsel), for respondent.


Basch & Keegan, LLP, Kingston (Derek J. Spada of counsel), for appellant.

Thuillez, Ford, Gold, Butler & Monroe, LLP, Albany (Daisy F. Paglia of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal to that court. Triable issues of fact exist as to plaintiff's claim for lost wages.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.


Summaries of

Freligh v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Dec 14, 2017
91 N.E.3d 697 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Freligh v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:James E. FRELIGH II, Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2017

Citations

91 N.E.3d 697 (N.Y. 2017)
91 N.E.3d 697
68 N.Y.S.3d 780

Citing Cases

Freligh v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.

The Court of Appeals reversed, finding "[t]riable issues of fact ... as to plaintiff's claim for lost wages,"…