From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 20, 1995
648 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1669.

January 20, 1995.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Richard F. Conrad, Judge.

Robert Freeman, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Upon consideration of appellant's brief and the record of his application for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we elect to affirm pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Although we do agree that the lower court erred by ordering that it would not entertain a motion for rehearing, our review of appellant's brief and the record convinces us that, in this case, the error was harmless.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Freeman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 20, 1995
648 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Freeman v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT FREEMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 20, 1995

Citations

648 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. State

It was affirmed without opinion. Freeman v. State, 648 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). His second Rule 3.850…