From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Freedman v. Amdur

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1964
160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 64-60.

February 4, 1964.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court for Dade County, John J. Kehoe, J.

Kelner Lewis, Miami, for petitioner.

Blackwell, Walker Gray, Kurtz Cooper, Miami, for respondents.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


Petitioner has filed a petition for issuance of a writ of certiorari to review an interlocutory order in a common law action refusing to require the respondent, Joseph Amdur [defendant in the trial court] to answer certain oral interrogatories. This petition is addressed to the discretion of this court [see: Easley v. The Garden Sanctuary, Inc., Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 59, 78 A.L.R.2d 1199; Flagler Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n. v. Whiting, Fla.App. 1963, 148 So.2d 555] and, following a review of it and the supporting brief and transcript, the court declines to entertain the petition and dismisses same, without prejudice to the petitioner [upon appropriate final appellate proceedings] seeking a review of the order here under consideration.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Freedman v. Amdur

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 1964
160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Freedman v. Amdur

Case Details

Full title:SHERMAN I. FREEDMAN, PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH AMDUR, AND THE NATIONAL SOCIETY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 4, 1964

Citations

160 So. 2d 131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Leithauser v. Harrison

Our review by certiorari is required to determine whether the court proceeded in conformity with the…

Flanagan v. Shamblen

This petition for writ of common law certiorari is denied without prejudice to petitioners' rights to obtain…