Opinion
3:13-CV-00029-HU
09-23-2014
HANNAH FREDRICKSON, ASHLEY KRENING, and MAURIALEE BRACKE, Plaintiffs, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Defendant.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation (#87) on August 7, 2014, recommending that Defendant should be awarded $350 in costs under Defendant's Bill of Costs (#61). That same day Judge Hubel issued a second Findings and Recommendation (#88) recommending that Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees (#57) should be denied. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Neither party has timely filed objections to either Findings and Recommendation.
When neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Revna-Tapia, 328 F. 3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT both of Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendations (#87, #88). IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the Bill of Costs (#61), Defendant is awarded costs in the total sum of $350.00. Defendant's Motion for Attorney's Fees (#57) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 23 day of September, 2014.
/s/_________
Malcolm F. Marsh
United States District Judge