From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frederickson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 18, 1991
585 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-3678.

September 18, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Joseph Tarbuck, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Tallahassee, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Annette Frederickson challenges the trial court's judgment and sentence for violating the terms of her probation for fourteen separate worthless check charges under Section 832.05(4)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm on all issues raised since there is no apparent prejudice to the appellant.

However, in light of the obvious conflict which exists between the terms of the oral and written sentences, we note that several scrivener's errors are apparent in the written sentences. Therefore, we hold that the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence, in which the appellant was sentenced to five consecutive five-year sentences, with nine sentences to run concurrently to sentence 89-966, is the proper sentence of record. We remand to the trial court to enter an amended written sentence conforming to the oral pronouncement.

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WOLF, JJ., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Frederickson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 18, 1991
585 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Frederickson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE FREDERICKSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 18, 1991

Citations

585 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Donald v. State

It is a settled rule of law that the written judgment and sentence must conform to the trial court's oral…