Summary
remanding for benefits where holding down a full time job would not be possible for someone who needs pain-related rest after limited activity
Summary of this case from McNutt v. AstrueOpinion
Civil No. 08-6094-TC.
October 11, 2009
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on August 26, 2009. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982).See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's motion for remand (#36) for further proceedings is denied. The Commissioner's decision is reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for the calculation and award of benefits.