From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frazier v. Stewart

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv569-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv569-MHT (WO)

11-30-2017

JAMES CALVIN FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that:

(1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 44) is adopted.

(2) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1) is dismissed with prejudice as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider petitioner's claims for relief.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2017.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Frazier v. Stewart

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 30, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv569-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Frazier v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CALVIN FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA STEWART, Warden, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 30, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15cv569-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2017)