From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franks v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 10, 2008
C-1-06-810 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 10, 2008)

Opinion

C-1-06-810.

March 10, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 11) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. This Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 11) the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

This matter is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Franks v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 10, 2008
C-1-06-810 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Franks v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:KATHIE FRANKS, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2008

Citations

C-1-06-810 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Astrue

This is fatal to his argument. See, e.g., Callaway v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-01245, 2012 WL 1014833, at *8 (S.D.…

Garza v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In addition, "because abnormal physical findings may be intermittent, their presence must be established by a…