From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 23, 2017
Case No. 16-12699 (E.D. Mich. May. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 16-12699

05-23-2017

ALFONSO FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.



HON. ANTHONY P. PATTI ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 13), GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. 9)

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's April 4, 2017 report and recommendation (Dkt. 13), recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) be granted, and that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice. The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, and finds that it is well-reasoned and supported by the relevant law. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As of this date, no party filed any objections to the report and recommendation, and the time to do so has now expired.

The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will, therefore, accept the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation of April 4, 2017, as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Patti's Report and Recommendation of April 4, 2017 (Dkt. 13) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against the State of Michigan are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED. Dated: May 23, 2017

s/Terrence G. Berg

TERRENCE G. BERG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on May 23, 2017, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties.

s/A. Chubb

Case Manager


Summaries of

Franklin v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 23, 2017
Case No. 16-12699 (E.D. Mich. May. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Franklin v. Michigan

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO FRANKLIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 23, 2017

Citations

Case No. 16-12699 (E.D. Mich. May. 23, 2017)