From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Gareyua

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 23, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

03-23-2017

Kyreese L. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. Carmen Rosa GAREYUA, et al., Respondents.

McMahon & McCarthy, Bronx (Matthew J. McMahon of counsel), for appellant. Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Matthew W. Naparty and Seth M. Weinberg of counsel), for respondents.


McMahon & McCarthy, Bronx (Matthew J. McMahon of counsel), for appellant.

Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Matthew W. Naparty and Seth M. Weinberg of counsel), for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether he suffered a serious left shoulder injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the underlying motor vehicle accident.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY, GARCIA and WILSON concur.


Summaries of

Franklin v. Gareyua

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 23, 2017
29 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

Franklin v. Gareyua

Case Details

Full title:Kyreese L. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. Carmen Rosa GAREYUA, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

29 N.Y.3d 925 (N.Y. 2017)
49 N.Y.S.3d 651
71 N.E.3d 1218

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Jahar

This Court cited to other cases besides Lemieux: Franklin v Gareyua, 29 N.Y.3d 925 [2017], affg 136 A.D.3d…

Cosme-Almandoz v. Alejandrino

The Court of Appeals has consistently upheld the First Department's majority opinions in this area of motor…