From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Burbank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. C-12-02640-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C-12-02640-RMW

03-26-2013

PAUL J. FRANKLIN, et al., Appellants, v. RUSSELL K. BURBANK, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 21, 2012, Appellants filed a notice of appeal from the bankruptcy court. Dkt. No. 1. The designated record on appeal was received by the district court on June 7, 2012. Dkt. No. 4. The scheduling order required appellants to serve and file a brief supporting the appeal within 28 days of the record being completed. Dkt. No. 2; B.L.R. 8010-1(a). Thus, appellants had until July 5, 2012, to file their opening brief. As of March 26, 2013, appellants still have not filed their brief. Therefore, appellants are ordered to show cause why their appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Appellants have until April 25, 2013, to respond to this order otherwise their appeal will be dismissed.

____________________

RONALD M. WHYTE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Franklin v. Burbank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. C-12-02640-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Franklin v. Burbank

Case Details

Full title:PAUL J. FRANKLIN, et al., Appellants, v. RUSSELL K. BURBANK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

Case No. C-12-02640-RMW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)