Summary
In Frankenmuth Mutual Ins Co v Latham, 103 Mich. App. 66; 302 N.W.2d 329 (1981), the insurer sought to have a policy of insurance declared void because the insured had made a misrepresentation as to the validity of his driver's license at the time he obtained the insurance.
Summary of this case from Coburn v. FoxOpinion
Docket No. 46363.
Decided January 21, 1981.
Davidson, Gotshall, Kohl, Secrest, Wardle, Lynch Clark (by Robert F. Wardle and Mary Ann Zito), for plaintiff.
Garan, Lucow, Miller, Seward, Cooper Becker (by Mark W. Thiron) and Gromek, Bendure Thomas (by Nancy L. Bosh), for defendant Allstate Insurance Company.
Plaintiff, Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Frankenmuth), brought this action for a declaration of rights under an automobile insurance policy issued by it through the Michigan Basic Automobile Insurance Placement Facility to defendant Bennie Latham. Approximately two and a half months after the issuance of the policy, an automobile owned and operated by Latham struck and injured a pedestrian, Jawine McCullan, a minor. Through her next friend, Delores Ferguson, McCullan brought an action in tort against Latham. Frankenmuth subsequently brought this action against Latham, McCullan and Ferguson. McCullan and Ferguson filed a counterclaim against Frankenmuth and a third-party complaint against Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate), which had been assigned McCullan's claim for personal protection insurance benefits pursuant to the assigned claims plan authorized by MCL 500.3171 et seq.; MSA 24.13171 et seq. Upon a stipulation of facts submitted by the parties, the trial court held that the policy issued by plaintiff Frankenmuth was in full force and effect. Plaintiff appeals.
When Latham applied for the insurance policy, he represented to plaintiff that he had a valid Ohio driver's license, although he had a Michigan address and was employed in Michigan. In applying for his Ohio license, Latham had represented that he was not under any suspension or revocation of driving privileges in Ohio or in any other state. Frankenmuth did not check Latham's driving record in Ohio or Michigan. After Latham was involved in the automobile accident which underlies this action, Frankenmuth checked Latham's driving record in Michigan and discovered numerous suspensions, revocations and driving infractions which would have been material to Frankenmuth's determination to issue insurance coverage. On September 7, 1977, Frankenmuth filed its complaint in the instant action, seeking to have the court declare that plaintiff's policy with Latham was void ab initio. We find that the trial court correctly held that the policy was in full force and effect.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co v Kurylowicz, 67 Mich. App. 568, 574; 242 N.W.2d 530 (1976), holds that:
"`The liability of the insurer with respect to insurance required by the act becomes absolute whenever injury or damage covered by such policy occurs * * * no statement made by the insured or on his behalf and no violation of the policy provisions may be used to defeat or avoid the policy.'" See also Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v Ayvazian, 62 Mich. App. 94, 100; 233 N.W.2d 200 (1975).
Affirmed. Costs to defendant Allstate.