From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FRANKEL v. ROST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1947
272 App. Div. 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

June 12, 1947.

Appeal from Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GENUNG, J.

Alexander Pfeiffer of counsel ( Clarence S. Barasch with him on the brief; Pfeiffer Crames, attorneys), for appellant.

Jerome L. Greene for respondents.


By permission of Appellate Term, tenant appeals from an order of that court affirming by divided court final order of the Municipal Court, awarding the petitioning landlord possession of business space in a room occupied by tenant at 724 Fifth Avenue, New York, N Y

The State Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, § 8, subd. [b], clause [1], as amd. by L. 1946, ch. 273, § 8, subd. [b], clause [1]; McKinney's Unconsol. Laws, § 8558, subd. [b], clause [1] requires the landlord to give to the tenant written notice of the "substantial obligation" in the lease claimed to have been breached, and the tenant is entitled to a reasonable time to cure the same following receipt of the demand that the violation cease.

In this case the landlord's letter of November 26, 1946, was not a notice to the tenant "that the violation cease," but merely a notice that the tenant vacate the premises. The landlord may not rely upon the notice contained in the letter of September 12, 1946, as all parties by subsequent acts clearly considered that notice of no effect.

In view of the landlord's failure to prove that they gave the tenant the required "written notice * * * that the violation cease", the order appealed from should be reversed. The defect is jurisdictional and fatal to petitioners.

The determination of the Appellate Term and the final order of the Municipal Court should be reversed and final order entered in tenant's favor dismissing the petition, with costs to the tenant in all courts, without prejudice to an application by proper notice in conformity with the statute.

MARTIN, P.J., GLENNON, DORE, COHN and PECK, JJ., concur.

Determination of the Appellate Term and final order of the Municipal Court unanimously reversed and final order directed to be entered in the tenant's favor dismissing the petition, with costs to the tenant in all courts, without prejudice to an application by proper notice in conformity with the statute. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

FRANKEL v. ROST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1947
272 App. Div. 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

FRANKEL v. ROST

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. FRANKEL et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1947

Citations

272 App. Div. 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
70 N.Y.S.2d 745

Citing Cases

Lewittes Sons v. Spielmann

In the latter case the tenant claimed to be a yearly tenant, but was held to be merely a monthly tenant to…

Guy v. Furman

Per Curiam. This proceeding should have been dismissed for failure to give the notice required by section 53…