From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frankel v. Rochester Iron and Metal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 1962
16 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

May 10, 1962

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Order modified by inserting a provision therein that the bill of particulars need not be served until 60 days after the completion of the discovery and inspection of the corporate records permitted in the companion case of Frankel v. Rochester Iron Metal Co. ( 16 A.D.2d 864) and by further providing that the order is without prejudice to the right of the plaintiffs to move on proper papers within 60 days after the completion of the discovery of the corporate records for relief with respect to specific items of the demand for a bill of particulars if they see fit, and as so modified order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: In our opinion, the plaintiffs should not be compelled to serve a bill of particulars until after discovery. In fact it might be impossible for plaintiffs to furnish the information required before discovery has been completed.


Summaries of

Frankel v. Rochester Iron and Metal Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 1962
16 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Frankel v. Rochester Iron and Metal Co.

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY FRANKEL et al., Individually and as Stockholders of Rochester Iron…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Cornell v. Mor-Nell Development

Indeed, the principle here enunciated has been uniformly held to be the proper procedure under the…

Bernard Cesar, Inc. v. Eberle

Such statutory provisions may not be ignored with impunity. We appreciate that had plaintiff moved to stay…