From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 28, 1978
44 N.Y.2d 687 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued March 22, 1978

Decided March 28, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, IRVING S. ARONIN, J.

Fred Queller for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel M. Cohen and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondents.

Henry J. Smith, Thomas D. Warren and Gerald Nolan for New York State Bar Association, amicus curiae. Michael A. Cardozo, Bettina B. Plevan and Richard N. Gilberg for Association of the Bar of the City of New York, amicus curiae. Roger Bryant Hunting for Committee for Modern Courts, Inc., and others, amici curiae.


MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice J. IRWIN SHAPIRO at the Appellate Division. In addition we would note our approval of the conclusion in that opinion ( 61 A.D.2d 466, n 2) that under the Constitution it is only the succeeding Legislature, here the 1977 Legislature, which had the authority and "the duty * * * to submit each proposed amendment or amendments to the people * * * in such manner" as it shall prescribe (NY Const, art XIX, § 1). In our view that is precisely what the Constitution provides and, of course, that is exactly what was done in this case.

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and COOKE concur; Chief Judge BREITEL and Judge FUCHSBERG taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Frank v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 28, 1978
44 N.Y.2d 687 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Frank v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:HARRY B. FRANK et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 28, 1978

Citations

44 N.Y.2d 687 (N.Y. 1978)
405 N.Y.S.2d 454
376 N.E.2d 927

Citing Cases

Schulz v. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court was also persuaded by the fact that the proposed amendments were located in five separate…

New York Criminal & Civil Courts Bar Ass'n v. State

Plaintiffs, in urging that the amendment relating to selection of Judges of the Court of Appeals is invalid,…