From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Frank v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 6, 1997
697 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-1218

Opinion filed August 6, 1997.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marc H. Gold, Judge; L.T. Case No. 94-12165CF10A.

Charles M. Frank, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


The trial court failed to attach to its order those parts of the record that conclusively refute appellant's claims for post-conviction relief. In Hastings v. State, 670 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), this court stated that "[t]he state's supplementation of the order with portions of the record is insufficient to support the trial court's summary denial."

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's motion for post-conviction relief and remand this cause for either attachment of portions of the record refuting his claims for relief or for an evidentiary hearing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Frank v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 6, 1997
697 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Frank v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. FRANK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 6, 1997

Citations

697 So. 2d 584 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Ward v. State

The state's supplementation of the order with portions of the record is insufficient to support the trial…