Summary
In Frank Co. v. Nathan, 159 Ga. 202, 208 (125 S.E. 66), it was held: "But a bill of complaint in a suit to reform a written instrument must clearly and distinctly state what was the contract or agreement between the parties, and show what part of the contract was omitted when it was reduced to writing, or what portion of the contract as it was expressed in the writing was not embraced in the original contract.
Summary of this case from Georgia Industrial c. Co. v. SmithOpinion
July, 1925.
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.