From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francois v. Rigdon

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
May 14, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-3485, SECTION: "A" (4) (E.D. La. May. 14, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-3485, SECTION: "A" (4).

May 14, 2009


ORDER


The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of the plaintiff to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. No. 45) is hereby GRANTED. Christopher Andy Francois's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the warden of the Rayburn Correctional Center shall thoroughly review the second grievance filed by Francois (ARP No. RCC 2007-508) within 60 days of the date of this order to allow him to properly exhaust administrative remedies.


Summaries of

Francois v. Rigdon

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
May 14, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-3485, SECTION: "A" (4) (E.D. La. May. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Francois v. Rigdon

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ANDY FRANCOIS v. SGT. WILLIAM RIGDON, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: May 14, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-3485, SECTION: "A" (4) (E.D. La. May. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wooley v. Patterson

In tare situations where inmates, through no lack of diligence on their part, have genuinely been precluded…

Richards v. Wallace

are employed at RCC, which is a state-owned, DOC jail facility. See, e.g., Francois v. Rigdon, No.…