From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Francis v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Aug 25, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0168 (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

Summary

finding that alien's extended custody was due to his own refusal to speak with consulate

Summary of this case from Figuereo v. Gillis

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0168

08-25-2014

FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS v. ERIC HOLDER, JR.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Floyd Stanhope Francis' Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] and associated motion for preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 2] contained in his supplemental brief are hereby DENIED and DISMISSED.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 25th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Francis v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Aug 25, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0168 (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

finding that alien's extended custody was due to his own refusal to speak with consulate

Summary of this case from Figuereo v. Gillis
Case details for

Francis v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD STANHOPE FRANCIS v. ERIC HOLDER, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 25, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0168 (W.D. La. Aug. 25, 2014)

Citing Cases

Stinson v. Barr

Stinson's removal period can, of necessity, be extended indefinitely if he fails to comply with efforts to…

Rathod v. Barr

See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(47)(B) (an order of removal "shall become final upon the earlier of--(i) a determination…