From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franchitti v. Bloomberg L.P.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 16, 2004
No. 03 Civ. 7496 (LAK) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2004)

Opinion

No. 03 Civ. 7496 (LAK) (JCF).

November 16, 2004

Robert B. Davis, Esq., New York, New York, Attorney for Plaintiff.

WILLKIE FARR GALLAGHER LLP, Thomas H. Golden, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants.


STIPULATION


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendants, that the time for Defendants to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint in the within action is extended to and including November 29, 2004.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Franchitti v. Bloomberg L.P.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 16, 2004
No. 03 Civ. 7496 (LAK) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Franchitti v. Bloomberg L.P.

Case Details

Full title:JEAN-CLAUDE FRANCHITTI, Plaintiff, v. BLOOMBERG L.P., SANDRA HUTCHINS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 16, 2004

Citations

No. 03 Civ. 7496 (LAK) (JCF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2004)

Citing Cases

Hall v. FMR Corp.

Consequently, so much of Count III as alleges discrimination based on national origin must be DISMISSED.…

Gamas v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

Whether a claim of ancestry discrimination is cognizable under § 1981 depends upon whether the group whose…