From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.P.V. v. City of N.Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 19, 2019
169 A.D.3d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8426 Index 350127/13

02-19-2019

F.P.V., etc., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng of counsel), for appellants. Greenberg & Stein, P.C., New York (Ian Asch of counsel), for respondents.


Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Fay Ng of counsel), for appellants.

Greenberg & Stein, P.C., New York (Ian Asch of counsel), for respondents.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kapnick, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.

DOE satisfied its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence showing that infant plaintiff's injury was caused while he was participating in a game of "Bulldog" in gym class when a fellow student suddenly and unexpectedly collided with him, which was a spontaneous act, and that no additional supervision could have prevented the injury (see M.V. v. City of New York, 149 A.D.3d 641, 52 N.Y.S.3d 362 [1st Dept. 2017] ; Chynna A. v. City of New York, 143 A.D.3d 623, 40 N.Y.S.3d 72 [1st Dept. 2016] ).

Under the circumstances, including how the game was played, the number of students and the size of the gym space, plaintiff established that there are issues of fact warranting a trial.

We have considered DOE's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

F.P.V. v. City of N.Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 19, 2019
169 A.D.3d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

F.P.V. v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:F.P.V., etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. City of New York, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 19, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 1173
92 N.Y.S.3d 651