Foster v. Rivera

Full title: Melvin Foster, #06430-112, Petitioner, v. Mrs. Rivera, Warden, FCI Estill…

Court: United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division

Date published: Oct 9, 2007

C.A. No. 9:07-0576-HMH-GCK (D.S.C. Oct. 9, 2007)

Opinion

C.A. No. 9:07-0576-HMH-GCK.

October 9, 2007

OPINION ORDER

HENRY HERLONG JR., District Judge

This matter is before the court with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 of the District of South Carolina.¹ Melvin Foster ("Foster") seeks habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that his due process rights were violated during a prison disciplinary hearing where he was found guilty of possession of marijuana. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Kosko recommends granting the Respondent's motion for summary judgment.

1 The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility for making a final determination remains with the United States District Court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006).

Foster filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Objections to the Report and Recommendation must be specific. Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of a party's right to further judicial review, including appellate review, if the recommendation is accepted by the district judge.See United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 n. 4 (4th Cir. 1984). In the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).

Upon review, the court finds that Foster's objections are non-specific, unrelated to the dispositive portions of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, or merely restate his claims. Therefore, after a thorough review of Magistrate Judge Kosko's Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the Respondent's motion for summary judgment, docket number 10, is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The Petitioner is hereby notified that he has the right to appeal this order within sixty (60) days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.