From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Fowler

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 30, 1995
652 So. 2d 993 (La. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-CD-0675

March 30, 1995

IN RE: Fowler, Jerry Comr./Elec.; Louisiana Dept. Elec./Regist.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge Nineteenth Judicial District Court Div. "I" Number 413,377


Granted. The trial court has decreed, and the parties agree, that the Justice Department's objection to La.R.S. 18:115 (F)(2) renders that portion of the act invalid. However, that portion of the Act is severable, the other provisions of the Act are not affected, and the Act may therefore be given effect without the invalid provision. La.R.S. 24:175; State v. Cinel, 646 So.2d 309, 314 (La. 1994); Succession of Lauga, 624 So.2d 1156, 1171 (La. 1993); State v. Johnson, 343 So.2d 705 (La. 1977); Roy v. Edwards, 294 So.2d 507 (La. 1974); Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, 237 La. 1082, 112 So.2d 720 (1959); Pollitt v. Connick, 596 F. Supp. 261 (E.D. La. 1984); 2 Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, section 44.04, (Sands 4th ed., 1986). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the plaintiff's petition is dismissed.

JLD

PFC

WFM

JCW

LEMMON, J. votes to grant the application and docket for expedited consideration.

KIMBALL, J. dissents from the issuance of the per curiam. Because of the importance of the issues presented in this application, I would grant and docket this matter for expedited briefing and argument.

JOHNSON, J. not on panel.

VICTORY, J. votes to grant the application and docket for expedited consideration.


Summaries of

Foster v. Fowler

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 30, 1995
652 So. 2d 993 (La. 1995)
Case details for

Foster v. Fowler

Case Details

Full title:SENATOR M. J. "MIKE" FOSTER vs. JERRY M. FOWLER, COMMISSIONER OF ELECTIONS…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 30, 1995

Citations

652 So. 2d 993 (La. 1995)

Citing Cases

Mount Union Borough v. Kunz

The corporation in question must be a private one, and the appellants insist the water company was not of…

Hutchinson v. Krueger

Oregon: In Portland Lbr., etc., Co. v. School District, 13 Or. 283, 10 P. 350, the rule is based on the…