Opinion
Argued October 18, 1887
Decided October 25, 1887
Matthew Hale for motion.
Nathaniel C. Moak opposed
Per Curiam mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Fortsmann v. Shulting
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1887
14 N.E. 190 (N.Y. 1887)
Summaries of
Fortsmann v. Shulting
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 25, 1887
14 N.E. 190 (N.Y. 1887)
Case details for
Fortsmann v. Shulting
Case Details
Full title:JULIUS FORTSMANN et al., Respondents, v . RUTH A. SHULTING…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 25, 1887
Citations
14 N.E. 190 (N.Y. 1887)
14 N.E. 190
Citing Cases
McGruer v. Abbott
I think, however, that the learned counsel for respondent is in error in his construction of section 1351 of…
Matter of HeldmannNeither this section nor general rule 2 in terms requires the notice to be formally addressed to the person…