From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortin v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Feb 24, 2015
No. 1:14-cv-00223-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 24, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:14-cv-00223-GZS

02-24-2015

MICHAEL L. FORTIN, Plaintiff v. KEVIN COX, Defendant


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on November 24, 2014, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20). Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 22) on December 8, 2014.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.



2. It is ORDERED that: (a) Plaintiff's claim based on Defendant's alleged violation of PREA is hereby DISMISSED; and (b) Plaintiff's claim based on Defendant's alleged verbal harassment is hereby DISMISSED.

Therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1), as supplemented by his Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. 14), now serves as the operative pleading.

/s/ George Z. Singal

U.S. District Judge
Dated this 24th day of February, 2015.


Summaries of

Fortin v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine
Feb 24, 2015
No. 1:14-cv-00223-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Fortin v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL L. FORTIN, Plaintiff v. KEVIN COX, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Maine

Date published: Feb 24, 2015

Citations

No. 1:14-cv-00223-GZS (D. Me. Feb. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Obele v. Town of Brookline

Unkind comments, even those made by police officers, do not themselves rise to the level of a constitutional…

Gagnon v. Fitzpatrick

This Court has adopted or affirmed recommended decisions based on this principle on at least two prior…