From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fort James Operating Co. v. Irby

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Jul 30, 2004
895 So. 2d 298 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004)

Opinion

2020598.

July 30, 2004.

Appeal from Choctaw Circuit Court (CV-98-150), Harold L. Crow, Judge.

Terry A. Moore of Vickers, Riis, Murray Curran, L.L.C., Mobile, for appellant.

William L. Utsey and Tara B. Armistead of Utsey Utsey, Butler, for appellee.

J. Cecil Gardner, Mobile, for amicus curiae Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical Energy Workers International Union, in support of the appellee.


After Remand from the Supreme Court


The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fort James Operating Company, 895 So.2d 294 (Ala. 2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed insofar as it denied Fort James a setoff of the workers' compensation benefits for the sickness-and-accident benefits Fort James paid to Irby and insofar as it awarded "other benefits" to Irby. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fort James Operating Co. v. Irby

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Jul 30, 2004
895 So. 2d 298 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004)
Case details for

Fort James Operating Co. v. Irby

Case Details

Full title:FORT JAMES OPERATING COMPANY v. William F. IRBY, Jr

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jul 30, 2004

Citations

895 So. 2d 298 (Ala. Civ. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Norandal U.S.A. v. Graben

During oral argument, the employee asserted that, even if he could not recover nonscheduled benefits on…

Norandal U.S.A. v. Graben

During oral argument, the employee asserted that, even if he could not recover nonscheduled benefits on…