From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forrest v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 29, 2017
NO. 02-17-00117-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 02-17-00117-CR

06-29-2017

CHRISTOPHER FORREST APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. F16-546-158 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Christopher Forrest attempts to appeal the trial court's denial of his request for a judgment nunc pro tunc.

By letter dated April 20, 2017, we notified Appellant of our concern that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court's order does not appear to be appealable. See Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (providing that the appropriate remedy for denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is to file an application for writ of mandamus in a court of appeals); Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (same). We informed Appellant that unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by May 1, 2017, the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We have not received a response.

Because we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Florence, 319 S.W.3d at 696; Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d at 148-49.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE PANEL: SUDDERTH, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: June 29, 2017


Summaries of

Forrest v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 29, 2017
NO. 02-17-00117-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Forrest v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER FORREST APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jun 29, 2017

Citations

NO. 02-17-00117-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 29, 2017)