From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forrest v. All Cities Mortgage Financial, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 16, 2007
Case No. 06-C-424 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)

Summary

noting that a party's "duty to prevent spoliation of relevant evidence is inherent in the judicial process"

Summary of this case from Gregg v. Local 305 IBEW

Opinion

Case No. 06-C-424.

October 16, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


This is a putative class action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"). Steven Theesfeld ("Theesfeld") of Yost Baill, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, attorney for All Cities Mortgage and Financial, Inc. ("All Cities"), moves to withdraw as counsel. Theesfeld states that All Cities is shutting down business effective November 1, 2007 and the attorney-client relationship was terminated as a result. Theesfeld's motion to withdraw is granted. See Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co. of New York v. Intercounty Nat'l Title Ins. Co., 310 F.3d 537, 540 (7th Cir. 2002) (attorney in civil action should be allowed to withdraw where client will not pay for legal services).

After Theesfeld moved to withdraw, Forrest moved for an order requiring All Cities to preserve documents related to this lawsuit. Forrest argues that All Cities' business shutdown raises the possibility of evidence spoliation. Forrest offers no evidence that All Cities is actually destroying evidence or failing to retain relevant documentation. In this light, Forrest's motion is unnecessary. All Cities' duty to prevent spoliation of relevant evidence is inherent in the judicial process. See, e.g., Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, 218 (S.D.N.Y. 2003); Danis v. USN Comm., Inc., No. 98 C 7482, 2000 WL 1694325, at *33 (N.D. Ill. Oct 23, 2000) (formal discovery request is not necessary to trigger duty to preserve evidence). All Cities' business shutdown does nothing to impact this inherent duty.

Finally, this case cannot proceed while All Cities is unrepresented. See Old Ben Coal Co. v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 476 F.3d 418, 418-19 (7th Cir. 2007) (corporation cannot appear pro se in federal court). Therefore, All Cities must obtain counsel within thirty days of the date of this order. Failure to do so may result in the entry of an adverse judgment against it.

NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Theesfeld's motion to withdraw [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED;

2. Forrest's motion to preserve evidence [Docket No. 23] is DENIED without prejudice; and

3. All Cities must obtain counsel within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. All Cities' new attorney should enter an appearance in that same time frame. Failure to do so may result in the entry of an adverse judgment against All Cities.

SO ORDERED,


Summaries of

Forrest v. All Cities Mortgage Financial, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 16, 2007
Case No. 06-C-424 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)

noting that a party's "duty to prevent spoliation of relevant evidence is inherent in the judicial process"

Summary of this case from Gregg v. Local 305 IBEW
Case details for

Forrest v. All Cities Mortgage Financial, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY FORREST, Plaintiff, v. ALL CITIES MORTGAGE AND FINANCIAL, Inc.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

Citations

Case No. 06-C-424 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Norwood v. E. Allen Cnty. Sch.

See Vukadinovich, 2008 WL 5377720, at *1 ("Here, though as asserted, Vukadinovich was 'crystal clear' in his…

Gregg v. Local 305 IBEW

Despite Gregg's concerns about spoliation, he offers no evidence that the Union has altered or destroyed…