From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 28, 2018
238 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 4D17–3854

02-28-2018

James FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James Forney, Raiford, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


James Forney, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant's claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j) ; Braddy v. State , 111 So.3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012) ; Hedrick v. State , 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed .

Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Forney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 28, 2018
238 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Forney v. State

Case Details

Full title:James FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

238 So. 3d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Forney v. Warden

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of this motion on February 28, 2018. See Forney v. …